X10 Community Forum

🖥️ActiveHome Pro => ActiveHome Pro General => Topic started by: ggrote on January 03, 2011, 04:00:15 PM

Title: Returning to the fray?
Post by: ggrote on January 03, 2011, 04:00:15 PM
Hi All,

It's been over a year, so I thought I stop by to see what's new ... turns out there is quite a bit! (see the end of my post for background info, if interested)

Last time I was here, AHP was v3.236, but it was highly recommended by folks in the forum that users downgrade to 3.228, which was more stable (ironic, given the release notes for 3.236), and that is what I am still running.  And as of last fall there hadn't been a software update in 9 months.  However, I see that there have been 10 updates since March, including Win7 support (which is good because I just bought a Win7 PC), so hopefully I'm returning at a good time.

I plan to read through a ton of posts, but I would appreciate any assistance you can give me:  Is AHP v3.301 a solid release?  Have there been any hardware advances to improve the reliability of X10 signal transfers in the modern household?  Can you point me to any specific new and interesting automation products or features?

Thanks, all!
Greg  ;D

Background:  I bought a bunch of X-10 stuff fall 2009 for some projects (CM15A, RR501, AHP, and a wide array of switches, etc.), but couldn't get it to work reliably except for an XPS3 that does a decent job of controlling my 7 outdoor soffit can lights with CFLs.  I was planning to install a XTB-IIR in the hopes of blasting through the noise but balked at the installed cost (most of which was going to be the electrician fees).  I'm using a WS12A and two WS14A dimmers in my living room (manual operation only) and a couple of WS467 switches for outside lights near doors (also manual operation only), the latter only because I'm still hoping to someday get them to work with MS16A sensors to automatically turn on the lights when someone comes to the door.  I also use a TM751 to turn on the Christmas tree lights, or to operate a lamp when we're on vacation.  But suffice it to say that I never did get my initial design concept to work.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: troll334 on January 03, 2011, 04:56:04 PM
Jeff,
I've since joined the group while you were out  :)
Get a copy of Jeff Volp's XTBM. It's a great plc testing tool. You will be amazed at the dirty
things you'll find on your powerline.  Once you've worked that tool, you'll likely be purchasing
a few XPPF filters to squash the noise makers.  Heck, you may not need Jeff's XTB-IIR. I chose
to get all this stuff (in reverse order - duh!). I may not have needed the XTB-IIR but still glad
I made the purchase. My X10 voltage signal readings are over 5V everywhere in the house. I've
now got a nearly 100% purrrfect system.
Make the investment in the XTBM. You won't be sorry.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 03, 2011, 05:33:08 PM
Make the investment in the XTBM. You won't be sorry.

I second that motion.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Brandt on January 03, 2011, 05:57:24 PM
Yeah you can't really play until you have the playground setup  :)%

XTBM, XTB-IIR, and filters of a wide assortment...
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 03, 2011, 07:09:12 PM
Jeff,............you'll likely be purchasing
a few XPPF filters to squash the noise makers. 

Yep, third those opinions;  all except quoted one above;  if you can afford it, do NOT buy any XPPF filters - they tend to catch fire at well under their 5 amp rating!  buy the smart home equivalent ones instead and save your house from the fire!
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Brian H on January 03, 2011, 07:23:43 PM
I would also say. The Smarthome 1626 five amp or 1626-10 ten amp FilterLincs are a better choice.
Though the 1626 seems to be discontinued and only the 1626-10 is showing on the Smarthome site.
There  is also the ACT AF120 for loads up to fifteen amps if you need that much current capacity.
I have tested an XPPF at close to five amps and it did get warm and smell. They are fine if the current is kept to less than maybe three amps.

I have both an XTBM and an XTB-IIR myself.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 03, 2011, 08:58:31 PM
The XTBIIR high output will reduce the number of filters needed (if any).

We have a majority, the motion is carried. Have the record show that ggrote is to procure a XTBM.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: ggrote on January 03, 2011, 10:10:53 PM
You guys make it sound easy, and you obviously enjoy playing with this stuff, but here's what I'm hearing:  I should buy an XTBM, plug it into every outlet in my house and create a map of the results, and then do the same for all of the lighting circuits (I didn't read how to do that with the meter, but I'm sure I can) ... then I need to add myriad filters (BTW, I do already have several XPPFs in play - thanks for the loading warning!) and other restrictions, and/or an XTB-IIR (which will require several hundred dollars in electrician fees, because I want to live to tell about it and I don't want to burn my house down) in order to possibly achieve reliable functionality of my lighting automation ... yeah, when I put it that way it sounds perfectly reasonable!   :angel:

Okay, so I'm (mostly) joking ... but it does indeed sound like this is a lot more than I bargained for when I jumped in last fall ... all I really wanted was for my lights to go on and off at the right times.  I didn't expect that X10 would have decided to bring their automation products out of the hobbyist realm and into the mainstream in the past year, but a guy can hope, can't he?  You guys rock, and this is easily one of the best forums on the web ... in fact, have you ever considered that the excellent way you guys respond on this forum is in part fueling X10's lethargy?

Thanks for the great responses ... and maybe when it all sinks in (or when I see how much the alternatives will cost) I will change my mind.   :-\

Thanks, all!
Greg  ;D
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 04, 2011, 12:16:30 AM
[if you can afford it, do NOT buy any XPPF filters - they tend to catch fire at well under their 5 amp rating!  buy the smart home equivalent ones instead and save your house from the fire!

While I agree that running the XPPF at its maximum rating is not a good idea, it won't "catch on fire at well under its 5A rating".  They will carry a 3A load of a typical computer just fine.  When pushed to their limit they will get warm and start to smell like hot plastic.

The XPPF does have a significant advantage at lower currents in that it is a low-pass filter rather than a notch filter, which is true of all the high-current filters.  A low pass filter will block noise over a wide range of frequencies.  The notch filters will only block noise that is directly in the X10 bandpass.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: troll334 on January 04, 2011, 08:51:41 AM
To address XTBM in lighting circuits...
I followed one of the other guys' suggestions. Went to Depot; electrical department. Found the screw-in lamp
socket adapter that exposes a standard two-prong receptacle to which the XTBM connects. While there, I also
picked up a screw-in extender. This allowed me to easily get to the porch light fixtures without having to
disassemble the decorative glass panels, etc.
You're gonna have so much fun with this stuff.
Enjoy!
mike
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 04, 2011, 09:59:23 AM
To address XTBM in lighting circuits...
I followed one of the other guys' suggestions. Went to Depot; electrical department. Found the screw-in lamp
socket adapter that exposes a standard two-prong receptacle to which the XTBM connects. While there, I also
picked up a screw-in extender. This allowed me to easily get to the porch light fixtures without having to
disassemble the decorative glass panels, etc.
Nice KISS suggestion. One *Helpful* from me.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Brian H on January 04, 2011, 10:05:11 AM
Helpful from me also.
Only thing to be careful of. Is not to try using the XTBM on a light connected to the load side of an X10 or any automation module.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 04, 2011, 11:25:13 AM
... an XTB-IIR (which will require several hundred dollars in electrician fees, because I want to live to tell about it and I don't want to burn my house down)...

For people such as yourself, I am considering offering a "plug-in" version.  It will simply be wired to an ordinary dryer plug (not a passthrough), so it can't be used along with an electric dryer.

A molded dryer plug has 10 gauge wire, which is too thick to connect into the XTB-IIR, so this has to be done with a separate plug and 16 gauge power cord.  (The XTB-IIR is internally fused at 2A, so 16 gauge is more than adequate.)  The separate plug & cord are more expensive than a molded plug from China, but it would still be much cheaper than getting an electrician involved.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Noam on January 04, 2011, 12:52:04 PM
For people such as yourself, I am considering offering a "plug-in" version.  It will simply be wired to an ordinary dryer plug (not a passthrough), so it can't be used along with an electric dryer.

Jeff -
When  I bought my XTB-IIR, you strongly recommended that I install a dedicated 240V outlet, and wire up a matching plug to the XTB-IIR (which is what I did).

I guess this would help for those people that have an extra, unused dryer socket, but otherwise they would still need to bring in an electrician to install one. I don't know too many people who have an electric dryer socket they aren't using, though.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 04, 2011, 05:34:51 PM
I don't know too many people who have an electric dryer socket they aren't using, though.
Yeah, I agree. I think Jeff is seriously limiting his sales unless it is a pass through.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 04, 2011, 07:29:27 PM
I don't know too many people who have an electric dryer socket they aren't using, though.
Yeah, I agree. I think Jeff is seriously limiting his sales unless it is a pass through.

I'd be happy to use a pass-through if there was someplace local to buy them.  I don't stock any of these plugs, and would only install one as a convenience to a customer.  I have already done that for a few people who specifically asked, but now I'll add it as an option for those who want it.

Like any repeater, the best way to install the XTB-IIR is adjacent to the utility panel so there is almost no signal loss before the signal is distributed to the various circuits.  That option is not available to everyone, and the dryer plug provides an alternate means that will work for some.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Noam on January 04, 2011, 07:36:23 PM
I'd be happy to use a pass-through if there was someplace local to buy them.  I don't stock any of these plugs, and would only install one as a convenience to a customer.  I have already done that for a few people who specifically asked, but now I'll add it as an option for those who want it.

Like any repeater, the best way to install the XTB-IIR is adjacent to the utility panel so there is almost no signal loss before the signal is distributed to the various circuits.  That option is not available to everyone, and the dryer plug provides an alternate means that will work for some.
Jeff
Offering the cord and 220V plug is a nice option for those that can use it, especially if the customer would have the choice of a 3-prong or 4-prong "standard" dryer plugs.

A second benefit of offering this additional option is that it would give the customer a way to test how well their system works with the XTB-IIR (by temporarily unplugging their dryer and plugging the device in), before calling in an electrician to install a new outlet.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: ggrote on January 04, 2011, 10:19:52 PM
I'd be happy to use a pass-through if there was someplace local to buy them.  I don't stock any of these plugs, and would only install one as a convenience to a customer.  I have already done that for a few people who specifically asked, but now I'll add it as an option for those who want it.

Like any repeater, the best way to install the XTB-IIR is adjacent to the utility panel so there is almost no signal loss before the signal is distributed to the various circuits.  That option is not available to everyone, and the dryer plug provides an alternate means that will work for some.

Jeff
Dang, I KNEW I shouldn't have come back to read what you guys were writing ... dang ... now I'm tempted, even after I had started reading about z-wave ... dang ...

Okay, Jeff (et al.), here's the scoop ... I have an electric dryer ... if I had to guess, I say there was 30-40 feet of cable between it and the panel (think: opposite side of the garage, plus 6-8 feet) ... I also have an electric range, but it's probably 10-15' farther away yet ... the only other 220 that I have is a subpanel in the basement for my shop, and that run is much farther ...

My XPS3, which is 2/3 the way across the house from my CM15A, rarely misfires, so I assume it's at least on the same phase as my den outlets (where the CM15A is plugged in).

Both of the installed WS467 switches are similar or closer distance, and they generally respond to "on" commands from a MS16, but will only catch the "off" command maybe 1:10 ... similar response to "on" from the CM15, but almost 0% reponse to "off" command.  The goal was to get the house lights to come on when someone approached the doors ... if I can get it to work I would install them at all 7 sets of lights.

I also have an RR501, which I bought to help my WS12 and WS14 switches respond to a remote, although I rarely use the remote anymore.

I use a TM751 (from my original Firecracker kit, maybe 15 years ago?) for miscellaneous security and decoration uses, and it is pretty reliable.

My house is less than 3 yrs old ... 2100 sq ft ranch with unfinished basement ... and as nearly as I can tell the guy did a decent job of wiring it ... but my wife and I like our technology, so we have a ton of electronics and related items throughout the house ... not sure I'll be up for putting filters on everything, although I did pick up 5 of the XPPF filters and have installed them on some power strips (didn't notice any performance difference after doing so, but I left them).

I know that's not a lot to go on, and I'm certainly not trying to put you on the spot, but if I install an XTB-IIR and pick up an XTBM to help locate the nastiest noisemakers, would you give me something approaching even odds to get those motion sensors and WS467 switches to work?

Electrically speaking, I'm not the least handy guy on the planet, but I generally draw the line at working inside the panel ... for example, I wired up my shop at the last house, but there was already a spare circuit wired into the basement, so it was easy ... if I wanted to install a 220V plug adjacent to my panel (I have plenty of room on the wall in the garage), is there someplace that would give me detailed instructions on how to do it?

Thanks,
Greg
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 04, 2011, 11:41:45 PM

You raise a lot of issues.  Starting from the bottom, I can remember how nervous I was the first time I went into a distribution panel, so I can certainly empathize with you there.

Since you have both an electric dryer and range, the option of a standard dryer plug on the XTB-IIR will not work for you.  If there is spare room for a double-width 240V breaker, it is relatively easy to install a 240V circuit to connect the XTB-IIR.  If there is not room, then you have to look at maybe replacing some full-size breakers with the half-width ones to free up some room.  There are a gazillion books available at places like Lowes, HomeDepot, and bookstores that will give you the basics of how to make connections inside your distribution panel.  Pick one with good photos.  If you are still uncomfortable, then don't do it.  Perhaps you have a handy friend who would be willing to help you there.

If you don't presently have a phase coupler now, that is certainly something that you will need to achieve good X10 reliability.  However, you can buy a passive coupler with a pass-through dryer receptacle, so that is something you could consider.

Since you have a lot of electronic equipment, you probably have some signal suckers and noise sources.  I have found that the vast majority of electrical devices do not cause a problem for X10 communication.  And some of the simplest devices can be a major noise source, such as a Cellet cellphone charger that was discovered by one of my customers a couple of years ago.  There have been several threads on this forum on how to locate the offending devices, so I won't go into that here.

Except for the Leviton 6287 in-line filters I placed in most ceiling lighting circuits, we are only using 4 other X10 filters here.  One is the big 20A XPF filter for the 2200VA UPS feeding our “electronics circuit” that supplies one or two specially identified receptacles in most rooms.  The others are XPPFs for “unfriendly” loads, such as the 4W 120V Lumoform LED light that is the worst noise source I have ever run across.  We are using a bunch of CFLs in table lamps without a problem.  However, many of them are still the Philips EarthLights that we bought over a decade ago.  The only time the XTBM indicates any significant noise is when I turn on the Cannon copier (which is not filtered because it is rarely turned on).  I give this as an example that you don't need filters on everything.  Just identify the problem devices, and isolate them.

I won't push my own products in this forum.  However, I will say that once you isolate problem loads and achieve good signal levels throughout your home with relatively low background noise, your X10 reliability should approach 100%.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Noam on January 05, 2011, 08:35:22 AM
Jeff -
I gave you a "Helpful" on that one.

Greg -
I have to say, from my experience last summer, that Jeff really knows a whole lot about how X10 works, and how to find problems, isolate them, and increase system reliability.

He was also extremely helpful, both before and after I purchased the XTB-IIR, with helping me try to track down my mysterious noise problem (which - for those who were following the forums - turned out to be across the street at a neighbor's house), and getting my system back up and running.

I decided to hold off on getting an XTBM, but only because my dad is an EE, and was able to make the appropriate adapters to measure signal and noise levels with his oscilloscope and one of his fancy radio receivers.
However, next time I think I'll just spring for an XTBM. It certainly is easier to use, and can be moved from room to room more easily.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 05, 2011, 08:39:35 AM
[if you can afford it, do NOT buy any XPPF filters - they tend to catch fire at well under their 5 amp rating!  buy the smart home equivalent ones instead and save your house from the fire!

While I agree that running the XPPF at its maximum rating is not a good idea, it won't "catch on fire at well under its 5A rating".  They will carry a 3A load of a typical computer just fine.  When pushed to their limit they will get warm and start to smell like hot plastic...
Jeff

Jeff, I beg to differ asbout catching fire;  I have burnt wall to prove it.  2.6amp load measured with good fluke in line rms meter directly afterwards.  I have an empty fire extinguisher, burnt 2x4 stud, blackened outlet, left behind as reminder of the fire.  Luckily I had just walked into the room when it made pop sound and 15" tall flames burst out of it licked up the wall.  3 or 4 of the xppf filters I had in use before removing them all had melted coils inside.

Please don't say it won't catch fire as I have living proof it does.
 
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Noam on January 05, 2011, 08:48:56 AM
Helpful from me also.
Only thing to be careful of. Is not to try using the XTBM on a light connected to the load side of an X10 or any automation module.

How would I test for signal strength, therefore, on a circuit that doesn't have any outlets?
Would I have to open the box up, and wire in a temporary outlet for the XTBM near the switch?
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 05, 2011, 09:16:07 AM
How would I test for signal strength, therefore, on a circuit that doesn't have any outlets?
Would I have to open the box up, and wire in a temporary outlet for the XTBM near the switch?
$0.02
IF and only IF the operation of a two wire light switch is unreliable would you need to do this. Is there any fixture on the circuit that still is controlled by a standard switch, if so measure at that socket. That would give at least some indication of signal strength and noise on that particular circuit, especially if you could find a socket near the end of the run. If the circuit is strictly lighting fixtures (as your scenario sets up) think CFLs as a problem area.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: dave w on January 05, 2011, 09:25:30 AM
and/or an XTB-IIR (which will require several hundred dollars in electrician fees, because I want to live to tell about it and I don't want to burn my house down) in order to possibly achieve reliable functionality of my lighting automation ... yeah, when I put it that way it sounds perfectly reasonable!   :angel:

Okay, so I'm (mostly) joking
$0.02
Even spending a couple hundred for XTBIIR and a filter or two (and with the XTBIIR, you may not need filters) an x10 automation project is far less expensive than Z-Wave or UPB.  After the smoke clears I predict Z-Wave will be the "last system standing" but as the Z-Wave system grows it gets slower in response time, so it has it's own problems.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 05, 2011, 09:32:59 AM
Jeff, I beg to differ asbout catching fire;  I have burnt wall to prove it.  2.6amp load measured with good fluke in line rms meter directly afterwards.  I have an empty fire extinguisher, burnt 2x4 stud, blackened outlet, left behind as reminder of the fire.  Luckily I had just walked into the room when it made pop sound and 15" tall flames burst out of it licked up the wall.  3 or 4 of the xppf filters I had in use before removing them all had melted coils inside.

I do remember your report some months ago.  However, if the XPPF did indeed exhibit that failure mode when loaded to its max rating, there would certainly be many more reports, and I suspect the liability issue would cause X10 to either change the rating or eliminate the product entirely.

Cars don’t normally catch fire either, but several years ago there were reports of cars spontaneously lighting off while parked inside a garage.  There was a TV news story about extensive damage done to a home because of that.  If I remember correctly, there was some defect in the ignition switch.

We know that all X10 products are assembled in China, and are not known for the highest quality.  We buy X10 because it is cheap.  The unit you had may have had a defect.  Most electronic components come from China today, and I have received a couple of transformers that actually had open primaries.

I don’t recall if your report indicated what kind of load that XPPF was powering.  That could also be a factor because I found that some loads can cause significantly more heating in filter inductors than would be expected from their power consumption ratings.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 05, 2011, 01:14:01 PM
All good points Jeff.  Yes, a unit can have an internal defect that causes a larger problem; in fact, this one that did catch fire probably had a bad solder joint on the pcb from one of the 120v prongs;  As an engineer, I often have to evaluate why failures happen in electronic power equipment and in this case it appears the fire actually started at the pcb by this prong rather than the melting coils which is common.  The load was 8' florescent lighting.  In my book, any product that will allow a device like those coils to heat enough to melt down are just one step away from potential fire anyway. Since this melted coil has been observed by many people who knew they only had about 3 amp load on their XPPFs, I call that good enough proof in my book to not use them.  In addition, there is no fuse in these units;  all the smarthome  models do have fuses to protect against overload and they do not use this flimsy plastic coil holder either.  Sorry to harp on it but I think if we can save one person from a from a fire it is worth it.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Brian H on January 05, 2011, 02:20:46 PM
OH. I would not rule out a poor solder joint or part.
I had an appliance module with a 1/2 soldered female connector on the outlet end.

I also was one of the many who had lamp modules that went to 1/2 brightness. I traced it to a defective triac only firing on the negative half of the AC waveform.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 05, 2011, 04:49:49 PM
The load was 8' florescent lighting.

One of the issues that most people are unaware of is the impact that reactive loads have.  This was bought home to me a year or so ago when the low-pass filter in a XTB failed due to overheating.  The customer had several X10 transmitters plugged into it when it failed.  The inductors in the XTB low-pass filter are rated for 200mA without excessive temperature rise, which is 24 watts for a resistive load.  Typical X10 transmitter labels say they consume around 2 watts.  So, it was difficult to understand how a 6-watt load would have overloaded those inductors.  The answer is the transformerless power supplies in X10 transmitters are a reactive loads.

I did further testing with a Kill-a-Watt, and found that the VA used by a X10 transmitter is at least a factor of 5 higher than the indicated wattage consumption.  VA is the real time product of voltage multiplied by current integrated over the cycle.  In a reactive load, some of that current is out-of-phase with the applied voltage.  That cancels out some of the real power consumption, but the filter inductors have to supply that out-of-phase current.  The large out-of-phase current from the three X10 transmitter loads exceeded the rating on the inductors, and caused them to overheat.

A similar issue occurs when powering inductive loads with the XPPF filter.  The out-of-phase current can result in much more stress on the inductors that would be indicated by a current measurement.  Only a VA measurement would indicate the actual stress on the filter.  Since the unit that failed was powering fluorescent lights, the reactive load from the ballasts could certainly have been a factor.

The bottom line is that you have to stay safely under the XPPF maximum rating.  Performance wise, it works very well at blocking powerline noise.  Most people use it for relatively light loads, such as a noisy CFL or “wall-wart” power module.  As long as the power factor of the device it is powering is close to 1 (meaning there is little out-of-phase current), there is no problem powering devices up to several amps.  The real test is does the filter get warm.  If so, you are pushing it too hard.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 05, 2011, 07:04:07 PM
Jeff,  I do not know why you are defending X10's poor and dangerous design of the XPPF filter.  I will reply only one time then fade into the woodwork on this....

I have spent over 30 years working with reactive currents and power;  as you likely know, induction motors have both an in phase current to make torque and a reactive current at 90 degrees to make a magnetic field.  The vector sum of these two currents is the total current the motor pulls.  The only portion of this current that generates heat, in other words IR drop across those inductors inside the XPPF filter, is the IN PHASE current.  Reactive current does not generate heat or IR drop;  but the power company still has to supply it so hence the big issue about out of phase current. 

Please show me the reduced inductive load current rating on the XPPF UL label (copy attached for reference).  You will see there is none, as the main reason to derate a device for inductive load is if it has a contact in it;  the inductive load will cause additional sparking when the contact opens the load so it must be derated. 

My only point in posting this fire hazard warning was to alert folks who might not know that the XPPF cannot handle its 5 amp rating, it is NOT fused like the alternatives from others like smarthome are fused, and many more than me have reported that the parts inside tend to melt down above 3 amps load (remember, it is nameplate rated 5.00 amps).  A melting part means significant amounts of heat.  Significant amounts of heat can lead to flames.  Flames can lead to fire that burns houses down. 

It will not let me leave pictures so I will post them in the next post.

I will now fade into the woodwork and not comment again.  Sorry everyone for bringing this up!
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 05, 2011, 07:16:13 PM
pix 1
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: mike on January 05, 2011, 07:17:06 PM
fire
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on January 05, 2011, 08:23:30 PM
The only portion of this current that generates heat, in other words IR drop across those inductors inside the XPPF filter, is the IN PHASE current.

I'm afraid that is incorrect.  ALL the current that flows through the inductors generate IR loss, which is heat.  You can't have current flow through a resistance without IR loss.  The fact that the current is out of phase with the voltage means that it doesn't contribute to the power recorded by the electric meter.  It does cause losses in the transmission lines that deliver that energy, which is why the power company doesn't like it.

If you measure your fluorescent lights with a meter that can indicate both watts and VA, you will probably find the VA number is significantly higher.  THAT may be the reason your XPPF failed.

I defend the XPPF because it is probably the best filter available for low and moderate current applications.  It works very well when not overloaded.  The fact that you managed to burn one up doesn't mean that when properly used they are a dangerous product.  Many products are dangerous when improperly used.  If these filters commonly burst into flames at loads well under their rating as you first asserted, I would expect to see MANY more reports of such damage with the large number of them in service.

FYI, I have a few more years in this business than you do.  A good portion of my work involved fault-tolerant equipment, so I am very familiar with failure modes and stresses on components.  However, only when I began comparing the difference between the wattage and VA numbers for some representative reactive loads did I become aware of how significant this issue can be.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: doug-x10 on January 05, 2011, 09:40:07 PM
 :)+

I would just like to say that this has been one of the best threads I have read on this forum. It should be mandatory reading for all people starting out. I too made my purchase about 15 months ago and then started my education on 2 phases and line noise. It took all the fun out of initial purchase.
 B:(

Not having a lot of time to muck about, I have continued to follow the forum and appreciate all the fantastic people offering their help here. But this one post has beautifully summarized what every X10 beginner should know from the start. I now feel much better armed with the information I need to make all this work so much better. Thanks to all that have contributed and I hope this post becomes a sticky.
 -:)
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: ggrote on January 05, 2011, 10:18:36 PM
Really good stuff, guys ... I'll be handing out "helpfuls" after I post this ... thanks very much.

The guy who wired my house put in a lot of circuits ... my 200A main panel has 42 available slots, 29 110V breakers and 5 220V (dryer, range, water heater, A/C, and shop sub-panel), so I have 2 empty slots on one side of my panel and 1 slot on the other.

As it happens, my son's in-laws are registered electricians, but they live 120 miles away and are VERY nice people so I hate to bother them ... but I'll bet I could get some tips.  And I do have the book that I used to wire my shop in the last house, so I'll have to dig it up and see what it says about working in panels.

And I have a closet full of X10 stuff that I bought before I realized that it wasn't going to be as easy as I had hoped.

I haven't decided to pull the trigger yet, but I'm leaning ...  ;D
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: Brian H on January 06, 2011, 06:46:41 AM
Jeff; I have been doing some tests with my Kill A Watt Meter and was surprised at some of the PF readings and Watt vs VA readings.

Some of these so called energy efficient CFLs have a PF of around .5  :P
My CCFLs and LEDs are closer to .9

I also read about some countries where they are in full standard light bulb bans.
Having power distribution problems. The harmonic noise and out of phase issues. Are causing the automatic regulation devices to trip off on faults.

My ancient electronic school memories. Also said all current flows through an inductor even if out of phase to the voltage applied.
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: pomonabill221 on March 27, 2011, 12:55:20 AM
The only portion of this current that generates heat, in other words IR drop across those inductors inside the XPPF filter, is the IN PHASE current.

I'm afraid that is incorrect.  ALL the current that flows through the inductors generate IR loss, which is heat.  You can't have current flow through a resistance without IR loss.  The fact that the current is out of phase with the voltage means that it doesn't contribute to the power recorded by the electric meter.  It does cause losses in the transmission lines that deliver that energy, which is why the power company doesn't like it.

If you measure your fluorescent lights with a meter that can indicate both watts and VA, you will probably find the VA number is significantly higher.  THAT may be the reason your XPPF failed.

I defend the XPPF because it is probably the best filter available for low and moderate current applications.  It works very well when not overloaded.  The fact that you managed to burn one up doesn't mean that when properly used they are a dangerous product.  Many products are dangerous when improperly used.  If these filters commonly burst into flames at loads well under their rating as you first asserted, I would expect to see MANY more reports of such damage with the large number of them in service.

FYI, I have a few more years in this business than you do.  A good portion of my work involved fault-tolerant equipment, so I am very familiar with failure modes and stresses on components.  However, only when I began comparing the difference between the wattage and VA numbers for some representative reactive loads did I become aware of how significant this issue can be.

Jeff

Hi Jeff!!!  Thanks a BUNCH for the info.
I recently bought several XPPF's and they work GREAT!!!  I just wish they had a higher current rating.
I do have a Kill-a-watt, and you mention that you used yours to measure the VA and Watts of loads.
Would the KAWatt be the final answer to find out if the load that the XPPF is seeing is within it's operating range, so as to not create a charcoal briquet?
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: JeffVolp on March 27, 2011, 01:37:06 AM

To be conservative, try to keep both the VA and wattage number under 300.  They will get warm and may start to stink when pushed to their max rating.

Jeff
Title: Re: Returning to the fray?
Post by: stoney on April 02, 2011, 04:56:49 PM
Thanks for the additional information as well as the caution with  these and other electric / electronic products.
We all sometimes take such things for granted and I agree, this should be required reading by X-10'ers of all levels. :)+