X10 Community Forum
🔌General Home Automation => Automating Your House => Topic started by: devedsmith on May 22, 2009, 11:56:31 PM
-
I've noticed some significant performance differences in using NiCad batteries vs alkaline in the Eagle Eye motion sensors. I have one in our closet - indoors of course (70deg year round), and one outside in our driveway (30 to 100 deg - Sacramento, CA weather).
Both exibit the exact same behaviors with NiCad vs akaline: When using NiCad they transmit perfectly when the ON/OFF buttons are used, but not at all when motion is sensed. If I swap for alkaline batteries (Energizer BTW) they transmit using ON/OFF buttons and when sensing motion.
Is there a reason for this? I'd really like to use rechargeables but they just don't seem to work as expected.
-
NI-CAD batteries typically have .25 volts less output than normal batteries even when fully charged.
Have you considered trying the rechargable alkalines or lithiums?
-
NiCd and NiMH rechargeable batteries have a typical cell voltage of 1.2V compared to the 1.5V of alkalines. So your pair of rechargables give you a total of 2.4V compared to the 3V of a pair of alkalines. I believe someone made a post saying they had examined the Eagle Eye and determined that 2.4V was below the minimum threshold voltage for reliable operation of the components used in the Eagle Eye.*
The other issue with using most NiCd and NiMH rechargables is that they have a charge shelf life. i.e. They drop a significant level of voltage in just a few months even if not used. The only exception to this are the new pre-charged NiMH batteries such as enelope. This makes NiCd and NiMH batteries more suitable for heavy current use applications.
Also NiCd batteries are subject to a condition known as "memory" which make them less suitable than NiMH batteries.
*I believe this is the topic I remembered. http://forums.x10.com/index.php?topic=36.msg82408#msg82408 (http://forums.x10.com/index.php?topic=36.msg82408#msg82408)