X10 Community Forum

💬General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: dwc on June 22, 2008, 02:34:42 PM

Title: SR 227 wall outlet modules.
Post by: dwc on June 22, 2008, 02:34:42 PM
Is there a way to disable the local control feature in the SR 227 wall outlet modules?  I have a 2 pot coffee maker and when I set it up using a wall module to make the coffee in the morning unless I turn on both pots at the same time the SR227 will start the coffee maker as soon as I turn on the second pot after turning on the first pot.
Title: Re: SR 227 wall outlet modules.
Post by: Dan Lawrence on June 22, 2008, 05:15:54 PM
10 control on top, bottom outlet is always live!

If you need 2 things controlled, you need a cube tap in the controlled outlet for 2 devices.  If you want independed  control on both outlets you need a XPR - Wall Receptacle Module - Both outlets controlled but it's for a 220 volt line.
Title: Re: SR 227 wall outlet modules.
Post by: zach1234 on June 22, 2008, 06:15:27 PM
10 control
He ment or I think "x10 control" Thanks for answering that, I missed up getting those for 2.00.
Title: Re: SR 227 wall outlet modules.
Post by: dwc on June 22, 2008, 06:41:16 PM
The coffee maker has 2 pots.  (Regular & Unleaded).  One cord to plug in to the controlled outlet.  Each pot has a switch to turn it on.  When the first switch is turned on The module remains off, turn on the second switch the module turns on.

Is there a way to disable local control in a SR227 like a AM466 by cutting a jumper on the circuit board.  This would eliminate the need for a swamping resistor.
Title: Re: SR 227 wall outlet modules.
Post by: -Bill- (of wgjohns.com) on June 22, 2008, 11:40:51 PM
The coffee maker has 2 pots.  (Regular & Unleaded).  One cord to plug in to the controlled outlet.  Each pot has a switch to turn it on.  When the first switch is turned on The module remains off, turn on the second switch the module turns on.

Is there a way to disable local control in a SR227 like a AM466 by cutting a jumper on the circuit board.  This would eliminate the need for a swamping resistor.

Check out X10 Marco's blog here: http://www.x10community.com/marko/2006/06/disabling_the_local_control_fe.html#comment-52 (http://www.x10community.com/marko/2006/06/disabling_the_local_control_fe.html#comment-52).