Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501  (Read 4152 times)

Brandt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 11
  • Posts: 728
  • Sorry miss, I was giving myself an oil-job.
SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« on: September 05, 2009, 06:54:06 PM »

I had a TM751 that worked well with my palm pad and ss13a. Then one day it died. I replaced it with an RR501 because I also needed it to receive PLC commands.

Now the palm pad works decent (not perfect) with the RR501, and the SS13a almost never works with it. If I put the RR501 almost right next to the SS13a it works ok. The battery voltage of the SS13a still reads over 3 volts so it is good i think.

I've also tried the surge supressor trick where you put the lamp module and the rr501 on the same power strip to work in a quiet environment and it still has problems receiving. especially from the ss13a.

anyone have ideas?
Logged

Brian H

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 305
  • Posts: 13295
Re: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2009, 10:09:54 AM »

Was the TM751 a fairly new one? The new ones where much better at receiving RF commands in my tests. Over the older TM751 and even an RR501.
Logged

Brandt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 11
  • Posts: 728
  • Sorry miss, I was giving myself an oil-job.
Re: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2009, 11:06:37 PM »

the TM751 was about a year old, when i came home one day to find it dead.
Logged

Brian H

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 305
  • Posts: 13295
Re: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2009, 06:20:54 AM »

My Date Code 08D14 [14th week of 2008] has the newer receiver in it yours may also have had the newer receiver in it. Mine received better than my RR501 Date Code 02F23 [23rd week of 2002]. The SS13A is no known for great communication distances in some installations. This maybe why your TM751 had enough signal strength to receive it while the RR501 didn't.
Do a search here as I know some have used a small piece of wire next to the SS13As body to make the signal stronger.
Logged

Charles Sullivan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 94
  • Posts: 1565
    • HEYU - X10 Automation for Linux, Unix, and Mac OSX
Re: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2009, 10:49:55 PM »

My Date Code 08D14 [14th week of 2008] has the newer receiver in it yours may also have had the newer receiver in it. Mine received better than my RR501 Date Code 02F23 [23rd week of 2002]. The SS13A is no known for great communication distances in some installations. This maybe why your TM751 had enough signal strength to receive it while the RR501 didn't.
Do a search here as I know some have used a small piece of wire next to the SS13As body to make the signal stronger.

Here's a reference to the passive antenna.  It does work.

http://jvde.us/x10/passive.pdf

« Last Edit: February 26, 2010, 10:53:58 AM by JeffVolp »
Logged
Yesterday it worked.
Today it doesn't work.
X10 on Windows is like that.

HEYU - X10 Automation for Linux, Unix, and Mac OS X     http://www.heyu.org

Brandt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 11
  • Posts: 728
  • Sorry miss, I was giving myself an oil-job.
Re: SS13a doesn't play well with RR501
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2009, 01:48:46 PM »

The passive antenna worked but that is ridiculous. I switched back to a TM751, removed the antenna and it works flawlessly. Eventually I am going to get a W800usb.
Logged
 

X10.com | About X10 | X10 Security Systems | Cameras| Package Deals
© Copyright 2014-2016 X10.com All rights reserved.