I've almost run out of UnitCodes on my central HouseCode -
My DS7000 HouseCode is "L". Many of my macros, that use registered security devices as triggers, also installed themselves as having an "L" address. At the L11 address, there are 9 macros (all using security devices as triggers) Some DS10A's and a couple of MS10A's installed themselves as "L"s.
I'm trying to keep all interior lights on the "L" HouseCode so that my better ˝ doesn't have to contend with changing the HC on the PalmPads. 6 of the 16 "L" UnitCodes are used by either sensors or macros - My understanding is that I have no control over the addresses those items assign themselves.
My question is this - If I assign Lamp, Appliance, Socket, or Switch modules to those addresses, does anything get screwed up? And if so, what?
And, for instance, if I delete the 3 macros using the "L9" address, then install a Lamp Module on "L9", then recreate the 3 macros (using security devices as triggers), will they avoid using "L9" as their address?
If it doesn't matter, then I'll not worry. If it does matter, one might think of adding an entry to the WiKi - When you want to keep a HouseCode clear, and not allow sensors & macros to intrude, at first setup completely fill the HouseCode with dummy modules assigned to each of the UnitCodes. - and will that work? ... is it worth the effort?
Since it appears that sensors & macros that assign addresses to themselves do so randomly, it might be worth it to populate several HouseCodes with dummys?
What do the experts think?