Contact | X10.com
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.  (Read 13884 times)

dave w

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 139
  • Posts: 6116
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2010, 07:25:38 PM »
Quote from: nybuck on September 17, 2010, 06:44:36 PM
But in all honesty, I love my Windows 7.  Vista had more than a few bugs for me. 
I hate Vista bloat. Is 7 any faster than Vista?
Logged
"This aftershave makes me look fat"

Brian H

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 305
  • Posts: 13295
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2010, 07:29:47 PM »
Gee you guys make me feel ancient. I still use windows 98SE on a laptop with the original Active Home and CM11A from time to time.  rofl

I skipped Vista and my present computer is XP SP3. Have not gotten any new Windows7 computers yet and the upgrade adviser for Windows7 indicates it would be marginal on my present computer.
Logged

J.B.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 16
  • Posts: 319
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2010, 08:19:38 PM »
Quote
I hate Vista bloat. Is 7 any faster than Vista?



I'm running Win 7 Ultimate on a Quad and it's much more responsive than Vista was.
Logged

nybuck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 17
  • Posts: 405
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2010, 08:24:01 PM »
Windows 7 works a lot better than Vista did on my Dual Core as well...  and it's a modest machine.

Xp is fine, though.  I have yet to find something I want that is too new for Windows XP.
Logged
>!

Dan Lawrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 68
  • Posts: 3991
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #19 on: September 17, 2010, 09:17:23 PM »
Back to 3.271 again.

NO Problems with any timers or my single keypress Macro are still ZERO. 3.271 runs exactly like 3.228 did, no fuss, no muss, just dependability.

My prior experience with 3.271 was loaded over 3.228, which was loaded over 3.204, which was reloaded after a bad experience with 3.236 right at Christmas time, when 6 timers from my Christmas.ahx file failed to turn off 6 outside decorations at midnight.  That 3.204/3.228 application was over 3.236.  That was over 6 or 7 prior to 3.204 the first time.  How much residue from 2005 to 2010 was sitting in either the ActiveHome Pro folder of the X10 folder in Common Files? 

AHP runs on a XP Home system, Service Pack 3.       
Logged
I don't SELL this stuff... BUT I sure do ENJOY using it!!!

anthonylavado

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 23
  • Posts: 198
  • At a position relative to the observer.
    • anthonylavado.com
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2010, 10:18:33 PM »
Using a recent purchased CM19A with TM751.

I've got AHP 3.271 installed on my Win XP SP3 machine for everyday use. P4 2.2ghz, 1gb ram, 160gb HDD.

I tried it (just for kicks) on my main machine, Win 7 x64, Intel Core i7 920 (Quad Core), 6gb ram, 500gb HDD. Ran just fine.

Tried it on my Mac using XTension, runs just fine as well :-)
Logged
Follow me on Twitter: @anthonylavado
Now making guest appearances in the Home Automation Chat Room

BaBaLou.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 16
  • Posts: 244
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2010, 10:43:38 AM »
As I did call it a few week ago

http://forums.x10.com/index.php?topic=21118.msg119549#msg119549

I have had no problems with 3.271. I still don't use the OnAlert or MyHouse and iWatch. Blue Iris takes care of all the cams,Ip and x10 and the OnAlert is still in the works.
Logged

Dan Lawrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 68
  • Posts: 3991
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2010, 06:55:38 PM »
Quote from: anthonylavado on September 17, 2010, 10:18:33 PM
Using a recent purchased CM19A with TM751.

I've got AHP 3.271 installed on my Win XP SP3 machine for everyday use. P4 2.2ghz, 1gb ram, 160gb HDD.

I tried it (just for kicks) on my main machine, Win 7 x64, Intel Core i7 920 (Quad Core), 6gb ram, 500gb HDD. Ran just fine.

Tried it on my Mac using XTension, runs just fine as well :-)

Just so you know, the TM751 is "Impolite" which means it will step on other X10 transmissions.  I dumped my 2 TM751's for 2 RR501 Transceivers, which are "Polite" which means it waits until the line is clear to send. 
Logged
I don't SELL this stuff... BUT I sure do ENJOY using it!!!

Dan Lawrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 68
  • Posts: 3991
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2010, 11:47:17 AM »
Since this thread got derailed, I'm repeating it again.  The clock is running.


To ALL:

My offer for getting 3.271 "clean" will expire at Midnight September 30, 2010 Baltimore Time (EDT).   One poster has already asked for it.  Anybody else?   
Logged
I don't SELL this stuff... BUT I sure do ENJOY using it!!!

Noam

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 51
  • Posts: 2818
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2010, 10:50:19 AM »
X10 just revamped their software download page, and it looks like you are now able to download 3.271 directly from X10:
http://www.x10.com/support/support_soft1.htm

Look in the first section for the AHP download.
Logged

mike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 14
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2010, 08:49:45 PM »
Quote from: Dan Lawrence on September 19, 2010, 11:47:17 AM
Since this thread got derailed, I'm repeating it again.  The clock is running.


To ALL:

My offer for getting 3.271 "clean" will expire at Midnight September 30, 2010 Baltimore Time (EDT).   One poster has already asked for it.  Anybody else?   

sure it cc to me tool. tnx
Logged

Dan Lawrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 68
  • Posts: 3991
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2010, 07:29:57 AM »
Mike,

Do you  need to move to 3.271, your post is fuzzy.
Logged
I don't SELL this stuff... BUT I sure do ENJOY using it!!!

mike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 14
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2010, 04:05:19 PM »
Ya, real fuzzy - to me too!  Sorry.

I have netbook in house on couch and its keyboard is too tiny for my big fingers!

sent u an email.
Logged

Dan Lawrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 68
  • Posts: 3991
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2010, 05:13:37 PM »
Mike,

I can either send you the file that will get you 3.271 or you can download it from http://www.x10.com/support/support_soft1.htm    Let me know which way you want to go.

Dan
Logged
I don't SELL this stuff... BUT I sure do ENJOY using it!!!

mike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 14
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Perhaps AHP 3.271 is not as buggy as we thought.
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2010, 08:58:19 PM »
got it frm link. tnx.  hope all the older 2.236 plugins work with it
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »
 

X10.com | About X10 | X10 Security Systems | Cameras| Package Deals
© Copyright 2014-2016 X10.com All rights reserved.