Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: A Measure of Reliability  (Read 8054 times)

Knightrider

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 62
  • Posts: 1748
  • I love my WM100!
    • This Automated House
A Measure of Reliability
« on: October 05, 2010, 08:13:58 PM »




                         X10 Signal Strength
                          ______________        =        Volps

                          Noise Level
Logged
Remote control is cool,

but automation rules!

dave w

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 139
  • Posts: 6116
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2010, 08:36:59 PM »

  :D
Logged
"This aftershave makes me look fat"

HA Dave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 175
  • Posts: 7127
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2010, 08:59:39 PM »

                         X10 Signal Strength
                         ______________        =        Volps

                          Noise Level

And.... you would measure that with... maybe a VolpMeter?
Logged
Home Automation is an always changing technology

beelocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 9
  • Posts: 250
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2010, 09:28:03 PM »

 rofl I'm not sure that's entirely correct, since that would mean...

Noise Level * Volps = X10 Signal Strength

and Noise Level multiplied by anything is a bad thing unless you jiggle the numbers in your favour.


Since the application of Volps (JV) has an amplification effect upon X10 Signal Strength (XSS) the Noise Level (NL) would effectively be muted amongst the amplified XSS.

Therefore, although your measure of reliability is mildly amusing, it cannot be considered entirely accurate. It would be safer to say that

               -JV
JV*XSS=NL


That said, I must admit that it's been pretty long and complicated day and the writer may have achieved that state of mind where 'talking bollocks' (google it for wiki) takes precedence over mathemagical (yes, I know) equations, particularly long and complicated ones that involve multiple variables such as WAF, PCE and CARM (Wife Approval Factor, Phase Coupling Efficiency and Cash Allowance Remaining at Month-end). Also it's been a long time since I went to school and I've forgotten an awful lot more than I remember, and when you add in my convoluted SOH it can all get pretty complex.

Anyone who isn't confused by now obviously wasn't listening properly :)
Logged
Although my explanations may not be exactly clear, I do hope for slightly less cloudy.

Knightrider

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 62
  • Posts: 1748
  • I love my WM100!
    • This Automated House
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2010, 09:30:04 PM »

 rofl
Logged
Remote control is cool,

but automation rules!

Knightrider

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 62
  • Posts: 1748
  • I love my WM100!
    • This Automated House
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2010, 10:06:32 PM »

XSS - NL = JV ?
Logged
Remote control is cool,

but automation rules!

beelocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Helpful Post Rating: 9
  • Posts: 250
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2010, 10:20:44 PM »

XSS - NL = JV ?

Not complex enough to be convincing  :'
Logged
Although my explanations may not be exactly clear, I do hope for slightly less cloudy.

JeffVolp

  • Community Organizer
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Helpful Post Rating: 122
  • Posts: 2299
    • XTB Home Page
Re: A Measure of Reliability
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2010, 10:30:31 PM »


It isn't often that something on the web just cracks me up, but that one did.

Jeff
Logged
X-10 automation since the BSR days
 

X10.com | About X10 | X10 Security Systems | Cameras| Package Deals
© Copyright 2014-2016 X10.com All rights reserved.