..............If they would clean up their act, they would get much more business ....
And.... how much business do they get? This information you offer... is based on a factual account of numbers .... or what? For all I know... X10 has the greatest rate of click-through-to-purchase on the Internet. And the highest dollar purchase, per visitor, ratio.
Do have numbers that show differently?
I don't have the numbers now, but I used to see them every day. The rate of purchase and average sale at X10 were significantly down from their height (and still declining somewhat) when I left. Still enough to have a healthy business, but not as good I thought they could be.
The design of the site and the newsletters reflect a peculiar X10 philosophy -- that what the customers tell you they want (product-wise, site design-wise, etc.) isn't what they really want and their continuing to buy from the X10 carnival advertising proves that people really do want a jumbled, confusing, garish web site. I tend to think that X10 keeps those customers
in spite of the style of advertising, and that X10 could sacrifice some short term sales in favor of building a larger long term customer base by doing away with the circus and constant "sales" and crazy price claims.
The pop-unders from years ago that everyone still remembers were incredibly effective, however. There was a constant feedback loop between advertising click-throughs and site purchases that was ruthlessly performance based -- if it didn't sell, it didn't stay up. That performance was built on a slow Internet advertising market, a new and easy to understand product ("tiny wireless camera"), and a new way of advertising (pop-under) that got people's attention while also being really annoying.