If the Camera address are the same address as the Active eye + 1 or even same housecode you will get unexpected results.
Also Cameras need to be grouped in four to enable the switching to work correctly.
sending a A1 signal for camera 1 will turn off cameras 2-4 sending a A2 signal will turn off cameras 1 and 3-4
Using the PR511A isn't the same as you stated I have 2 of these in my setup as well.
I prefere them to the active eye as they send PLC so: no +1, or RF issues, and they supply the needed extra light.
Thanks Tuicemen.
I've known about the concept of grouping the cameras in fours from reading the posts here at the forum. But I guess it didn't sink enough and rolled off the side of my brain since it didn't interest me at the time.
Now that I'm thinking about adding an additional camera, I really need to pay more attention in conceptualizing how I need to setup.
So, I guess this is what I need to do. I've changed the "house codes" to closely associate with the device type.
- Camera 1: H/U = C1
- Camera 2: H/U = C2
- PR511A: H/U = P1 + 2
- Video Receivers 1 & 2: House Code = C
- ActiveEye H/U = A1
Macro 1: Triggered by ActiveEye (A1) and controls Camera 1 (C1)
Macro 2: Triggered by PR511A (P3) and controls Camera 2 (C2)
Macro 3: Triggered by A1 or P3 and controls the Video Receivers. Keep receivers on if off commands from both triggers have not been received.
OPERATION:
- On TV, camera remote can toggle between the two cameras.
- On PC, I can look into using
a. the iHouse with the workaround by Tuicemem, or
b. iWatchout, or
c. Blue Iris (not sure if it is AHP friendly or not though)
I think the only other issue is the signal strength and quality at each of the receivers as mentioned in my earlier post.
What do you guys think? Do you think my proposed set up is configured correctly and will work?
Thanks,
eagle